The Case of Death Penalty
The death penalty is one of the toughest punishments
directed at the person who commits treason against a thing. Whether, it is his
job especially his country. The death penalty was enacted by the Romans in the
early 18 century. Initially, the death penalty is reserved for religion only,
as for those who commit great sins in the world. But, as the age of the death
penalty is established it is one of the punishments considered to have a
significant impact on the problem, especially the problem of treason against
the state. Because treason is hard for people accepted. Betrayal that will be
discussed much more deeply is the taking or seizure of property rights by state
or government official in a manner commonly referred to as the word of
corruption.
If
linked between the death penalty and corruption must be very closely related to
each other. Why so, because a corruption is a very cruel act committed by
highly educated and dignified people, but they are often unaware of what their
position is with what they do. The problem of corruption in a country is no
longer a strange thing in the ears of society but has become a wisdom in the
ear for the local community. This is continuously happening in some countries,
one of which is our own country that is Indonesia. Perpetrators of corruption
are increasing from year to year, of course we must ask this, what is wrong in
this country so too much betrayal happens, and the short answer to the length
of the case is that no punishment can have a deterrent effect on the
perpetrator and to those who intend to commit the same crime. Why this
happened. Because when they are arrested for committing a crime they will only
be put into prison, a prison whose specter is not frightening because it is
equipped with luxurious facilities for officials. This is what makes the
perpetrators of corruption increasingly imperturbable because they are not afraid
of the punishment they will receive. Therefore it needs a change so that what
has been blindly in this country can be destroyed little by little only through
the punishment that can cause deterrent effects punishment that creates a
deterrent effect one of them is the death penalty, a punishment that will
deprive someone's life for committing a major offense.
Talking
about the death penalty, appearing various views from every circle. Let us shift
to the country of china and English. The country's corrupt population is very
few even almost non-existent. What makes it happened. Because in the country
they have applied the death penalty system for those who deprived the rights of
others, but this is contrary to some rules of law in our country. Discuss about
human rights. Human has no right to usurp the lives of others because of any
such thing. This is sanctioned, because man is not a god who can take the right
of one's life in any way and on any basis. The law is certainly created and
organized with a mature and profound thought. That everyone has the right to live
and earn a decent living. Therefore the death penalty is shunned against the
established law. There are many things that might be done to provide a
deterrent effect on the perpetrators of crime such as corruption.
The
death penalty may not necessarily lead to the perpetrators of a deterrent
crime, it can also shut down unfinished crime meetings, such as the death
penalty which apply to terrorist cases. The perpetrators of the bombings have
been executed before all the cases of terrorism are revealed. After the Bali
bombing case one, in Indonesia is still rife with other boom cases. This can be
made proof that there is no word of deterrence for terrorists in Indonesia. Being
eradicated are the factors that can cause the prisoner to commit a crime, not
the prisoner in question. The above quote can be an inspiration for remove the
death penalty in Indonesia. The death penalty is not a punishment, but the
death penalty is more visible as a reaction of revenge. Pancasila please the
first of the Supreme Godhead is also against the death penalty, in the first
precepts we are required to believe in the existence of God but what is done
clearly contrary to the precepts. Taking life is God's right, with the death
penalty as if it were human beings who were in charge of death human being.
It
is difficult to deal with this death sentence, as the death penalty is the
creation of human beings so that humans can change it. Indonesia as one of the
countries that still apply the death penalty can be said dead lice can not do
much with the polemic that happened, insistence from within and pressure from
outsiders to execute punishable eliminate make sovereign law of this country as
mortgaged.
In
society, the death penalty invites many reactions, not only in Indonesia, but
also in other countries. Reactions are there that support and some are not
supportive. Supporting societies, generally, assume that the death penalty can
make people think longer to commit crimes. Communities that do not support, in
general, assume that the death penalty violates human rights. Facts prove, when
compared with developed countries that do not apply the death penalty, Saudi
Arabia who enforce Islamic law and capital punishment has a low crime rate. Prospects
also reject the opinion of your group that says the death penalty (against
corruptors) goes against humanity. Instead, they argue that corruption is an
extraordinary crime against humanity. Corruption is a crime against humanity
that violates the right to life and human rights not just one person, but
millions of people many argue.
The
death penalty against corruptors does not violate the Constitution as already
declared by the Constitutional Court. In the current state of emergency of corruption
where corruption has caused widespread poverty and thereby 'killed' the right
to life of millions of people, it is fair to impose the death penalty on one
corrupt person. So the main consideration is the sense of justice that lives in
society. The death penalty is also applied to give a stern warning to public
officials not to commit corruption.
However,
the death penalty is only imposed on the most pernicious and widespread form of
corruption. In addition, the death penalty must be very careful about being
dropped. In a corrupt criminal justice system like today one is most likely to
be a victim of a miscarriage of justice.
So
it is very clear that some developed and developing countries applying the
death penalty can reduce than killing offenders such as corruption. So that it
becomes a lesson for a country that has an endless perpetrator of corruption to
hasten to take an action that can have a deterrent effect on the perpetrator,
not just to see the action of the crime continuing without action to reduce or
annihilate it. in other words the application of capital punishment can help
reduce the number of corruptors and death sentences accepted by some countries
that have proven the impact received on the application of the death penalty.
Author : Ariana Amir
0 comments:
Post a Comment